Elbows to Ankles

I’ve been speaking with the mom of a high school girl who was told at school this morning that her dress to her knees, cardigan to her elbows, and leggings underneath was inappropriate for school. The only skin this girl was showing was her forearms and hands. A school official told her boys were being distracted by her leggings and she would need to change. The girl asked if she should just remove her legs. The girl’s mother responded to the school official saying the problem was not her daughter’s legs but the boys’ behavior.

This is why I am against mandated t-shirts at pool parties, sexist dress codes, and the backwards Puritan belief our abstinence-is-best culture in the United States has – especially in our high schools and middle schools – that by forcing girls to cover up and not teaching kids about sex they won’t become sexual beings until they magically arrive at college and know how to behave, dress, and respond to each other. Girls’ bodies are not the problem. Our response to them, is.

Yes, I am profoundly against the sexualization of children and the media’s objectification of women. That is not the same thing as being anti-sex, or obtuse to the fact that our children will become sexual beings with sexual urges. That part I’m cool with.

I live in and am raising a daughter in a culture where men are attracted to every part of a woman’s body because I live in a sexually repressed culture, propagated by attitudes that females should cover up to avoid inevitable sexual arousal. I live in a culture where men are sexually attracted to my mouth, my eyes, my hair, my shoulders, my breasts, my hips, my butt, my legs, my toes….which is their issue, not mine. I will not hide away any part of my being – not my body, not my voice, not my mind. I dress how I want in a way that makes me feel amazing and I walk through my world with confidence and self-respect. I walk through my world in a way that very clearly sends the message to men they will respect me, regardless of what body part they may or may not be looking at. I am making sure my daughter is learning to do the same. I don’t view sexuality as a shameful thing. Acting disrespectfully towards another being in a sexual way is shameful. I am making sure my daughter and my son know that men and boys are intelligent beings capable of empathy, kindness, and self-control.

Sexuality in general means various people will find various body parts arousing. The basis to the argument that body parts should be covered up to avoid arousal places the onus on the viewee as opposed to the viewer. That argument feeds directly into Rape Culture and overall shaming of the female body as a vessel of sin and corruption of men/boys that must remain covered so as to avoid any sexual attraction. This leads to the removal of agency from females and gives entitlement to men as female bodies have shifted from sexual beings to objects they can police. This argument also leads to the expectation that boys/men cannot control themselves at any hint of sexual arousal and females must do all they can to not wake the beast.

Sexual arousal happens when women are fully covered – in military uniforms, burkas, business attire, a winter coat. Are we to stay completely out of sight?

There is no shame in our daughters' bodies growing into a woman's form.

There is no shame in our daughters’ bodies growing into a woman’s form.

I cannot disagree more with that framework of thinking. I do not believe in asking females to cover their bodies and being responsible for avoiding any hint of sexuality or sexual arousal.

I believe males are capable of controlling themselves. I believe human sexuality is not a shameful thing and should not be repressed.

I believe strongly we teach those becoming sexually aroused to control themselves, teach them to better understand the nature of sex and how to respond appropriately and respectfully to it.

I would never make my son nor my daughter wear a t-shirt to cover their body. I will make every effort to teach them openly about sexuality in a sex positive way.

Yes, students should dress appropriately for school. Don’t wear Saturday on a Wednesday. Yes, we should teach our girls the difference between objectifying themselves sexually and feeling, experiencing their sexuality.

But when we live in a country where day after day girls all across our nation are being told by the media to be sexy all the time, being told by their hearts to find the person they are, being told by their schools their education is less valuable than a boy’s and to cover up/go home/sit in detention because their distracting body caused a boy to look at them even when they are covered from elbow to ankle……we’ve got problems.

Bigger than any baggy t-shirt can cover.


UPDATE: The following question was asked during our Facebook discussion and I thought it would be important to add it here. From Tristin, Okay I have a question. I 100% agree with everything you wrote above (and read your book and recommend it to everyone). I read in your book about talking to our daughters about establishing the personal brand they’d like to convey to the world, and I think this is a great tool. My question is, though, about what happens when our girls decide that a particular brand they wish to convey doesn’t fit with what we as parents deem age appropriate? Who is to say that 14 or 15 is too young to wear such and such outfit? It’s her body- shouldn’t she have the right to choose how much skin she shows? What happens when I as a parent disagree with her decisions about how she chooses to present her body? And also, who gets to decide what is age appropriate? Shouldn’t a school have some say in this? But where is the line between making these decisions and policing girls’ bodies and choices?

My answer:  When girls choose a brand that we know to be age inappropriate or overtly focused on sex appeal vs whole being it is our job to coach and consult with them until they get it. It may take blood, sweat, and tears on our part, but we have to strike a balance between allowing her to develop into her own sexuality and keeping her age appropriate and not buying into copying what the media is grooming her to do.
If she is dressing in a sexually provocative way that is age inappropriate she clearly isn’t choosing that for herself, she’s been groomed to do it and is parroting what she’s learned – probably from the media and other girls. Since this decision isn’t coming from a place of authenticity it is okay to say, “No, you won’t be wearing that and here’s why. Please go choose a more appropriate outfit for an 11yo girl. When you are 19 and come home from college, that outfit will be fine. Today you are 11yo and you will dress like it.”
Again, not shaming, just teaching her there is a time and place for sexy. 11yo is never it. 14/15yo isn’t it. 16, 17, 18….I think that is generally the age where girls are moving beyond having crushes on boys (or girls) to really understanding the want to have sexual encounters and figuring out how to facilitate that. I remember that age. I remember knowing exactly what I was doing.

All I can say to that: each family needs to approach that in a way that feels comfortable for them. That will be different for each family. I am very open with my kids about sexuality and the human body, but that doesn’t mean they watch sexualized media now and that doesn’t mean I’ll want them feeling free to have sex in high school. The hormones will certainly be there, the emotional maturity a sexual relationship requires will not be. In that sense, they can wait.

Allowing her to develop a personal brand doesn’t mean she gets to do whatever she wants. It means you let her show you who she wants to be in the world and then we act like parents and say “I think you’ve made great choices” or, “I think that outfit sends some strong messages that you may not be aware of, or are aware of and then I’d like to talk to you about why you seem to focus on that one small part of you instead of all of you.” So it isn’t about shaming her, rather teaching her she is more than the sum of her parts and that there is more to life and one’s self-esteem than getting sexually-motivated attention from guys (or girls).

And you have to allow her to make mistakes. Talk to her about them and help her learn from them. As well as, help her learn from the mistakes of others’ because in high school I was sexually objectified while wearing my normal clothes, my cheer uniform, my soccer uniform, my uniform at the grocery store I worked at……you get the picture.

As you can see – these are all private, delicate conversations with a trusted individual that for 98% of girls will not be their school. This isn’t one conversation, it is ongoing little convos that help a girl develop her brand and in that, allow her the space to come into her own and allow her sexuality to actualize. That is a beautiful part of life and being a woman.
And I don’t want my child’s school having any part of that, nor policing it.


Melissa headshot 1 fb sizeMelissa Atkins Wardy is a speaker, media consultant, and the author of Redefining Girly: How Parents Can Fight the Stereotyping and Sexualizing of Girlhood, from Birth to Tween. She is the creator and owner of Pigtail Pals & Ballcap Buddies, a company that has been offering empowering apparel and gifts to Full of Awesome kids since 2009 www.pigtailpals.com.

Find her at www.melissaatkinswardy.com. You can connect with her on Facebook (Pigtail Pals Ballcap Buddies) and Twitter (@PigtailPals) and Pinterest (Pigtail Pals & Ballcap Buddies). 

Fifty Shades of Grey Isn’t About You, It is About Your Kids

Fifty will impact your kids more than it will ever impact you.

Fifty will impact your kids more than it will ever impact you.

The forest through the trees: One more comment on the Fifty Shades of Grey movie and how it impacts your kids, and then I need to get my head out of that space.

Whether or not you read the books or will see the movie really isn’t the point to us discussing this. My job, our job, is to understand how media impacts our kids – little and big.

Fifty *will* impact your kids for one very simple reason: It is making WAY too much money not to. The publishing industry and Hollywood aren’t big on original ideas right now (Fifty itself isn’t an original idea) and they like to go with and replicate ad nauseam what makes them money, honey.

Yes, there are young women out there who see right through all of this and they’ve done a great job communicating why to me. But these girls are also the ones who grew up completely immersed in the age of Princess Culture, when problematic stories like Beauty & the Beast and Little Mermaid were massive hits for Disney and those two princesses appeared on every product a child would touch during her girlhood. They came of age with Gossip Girl on tv and Twilight everywhere, with very little empowered stories about women’s sexuality in the media. Double down on that with zero comprehensive sex education in school and only 17% of parents talking to their kids about sex. So yeah, I can see where young women today think Christian Grey is Prince Charming.

Add to that, young men today face a very oppressing role of masculinity to live up to and would also have had zero comprehensive sex education in school and only 17% of parents talking to their kids about sex. Sexual relationships are confusing and comprehension takes a connection with our emotional selves, something our culture manages to kill in boys by the average age of 8. Boys are educated about sex/relationships by peers, media, and online porn. That doesn’t bode well for your daughters. Oh the stories I could relate that girls have told me of things they have done sexually out of ignorance and/or desperation to keep a boyfriend.

Media literacy isn’t about *your* kids, it is about ALL kids and their natural born right to be healthy and whole.

Can you really sit there and safely say “Well not my girl”? Consider this please – you have no control over what the current boyfriend learned from and had normalized by the girl he dated just prior to yours. So are you in the 17% having ongoing talks with your kids about sex? Or are you in the 83% who thinks they aren’t ready yet or they’ll just figure it out because it makes you feel weird discussing it?

I guarantee you your kids are paying attention. The question is, to whom?

See my post “Fifty Shades Is The Worst Of Us” for a deeper dive into the abuse-masked-as-erotica franchise and resources for parents/teachers.


Melissa Atkins Wardy is a speaker, media consultant, and the author of Redefining Girly: How Parents Can Fight the Stereotyping and Sexualizing of Girlhood, from Birth to Tween. She is the creator and owner of Pigtail Pals & Ballcap Buddies, a company that has been offering empowering apparel and gifts to Full of Awesome kids since 2009 www.pigtailpals.com.

Find her at www.melissaatkinswardy.com. You can read her blog at: www.pigtailpalsblog.com or connect with her on Facebook (Pigtail Pals Ballcap Buddies) and Twitter (@PigtailPals).

Fifty Shades Is The Worst Of Us

*TRIGGER WARNING: This post address the physical, sexual, and emotional abuse within and around the Fifty Shades of Grey franchise.

fifty tie

In the summer of 2012 the rich and sophisticated Christian Grey became a sexual enigma to millions of women. In February 2015 he was brought to life in movie theaters, serving as a permission slip for women to feel erotic all over again. Mr. Grey is no white knight yet his enormous appeal seemed to fill a lot of women who longed for burning sexual pleasure and the fantasy of being so intensely desired by a lover they accepted or confused domestic violence and abuse for a steamy romance. Fifty is a story about the abuse of a manipulated, inexperienced girl at the hands of a psychopathic man whom she tries to heal with her purity. Another version of Fifty is a story about a sexually curious young woman entering an erotic relationship with a rich and exquisitely attractive lover, neither able to deny their fierce attraction to the other. What is most clear about the Fifty phenomenon is that we need more stories told of women being free to enjoy and explore their erotic sides without shame. The massive popularity of Fifty isn’t so much what the story is about, rather it is an indicator of what many women feel they are lacking and fantasize over.

In order for a fantasy to work it has to offer the reward of something outside of the every day, the attainable. It has to exceed our dreams and become something we long for. It has to be something more grand than who we are or ever could be. All of this is to say, the misbegotten Fifty Shades of Grey is not fantasy. It is the worst of us.

Fifty is a litmus test of everything wrong with how women approach and understand their sexuality, specifically the significance of “having a man” woven into our definitions of self-worth. It is a manipulation of female insecurities around being found “beautiful”. It is everything wrong with how our culture approaches female sexuality. It is pop culture reinforcement that rich white men can do as they please, stalking/domestic violence/sexual assault can be rationalized away, men make decisions about women’s bodies, women long to be dominated and sexually abused, abuse can be loved away and broken men healed by our devotion, men show their true love through violent possession, and that a good looking and/or rich lover needs to be kept by any means necessary. That’s no fantasy, Sister. At a very great cost to women, that is real life. It represents the worst of us.

And we knowingly, willingly, and enthusiastically consumed it. By. the. millions.

When something like Christian Grey becomes a media zeitgeist it impacts culture, shifting our norms and trickling down to young people who are always in tune with the latest and greatest. In this case, the problem is Christian Grey and the “fantasy” sex life he offers isn’t so great and that is cause for concern for a younger generation ill-equipped to unpack all of this. (Resources at the end of the post.)

The Fifty trilogy is not a love story, it is a grooming course for abuse. The books are FULL of power imbalance, stalking, emotional manipulation, sexual coercion and several types of abuse. There is a meme going around that if Christian Grey weren’t rich and hot, Fifty would be an episode of Criminal Minds.


By now we are familiar with the back story – E.L. James was inspired by the Twilight saga and sought to write a more adult version of the melodramatic, twisted teenage love-triangle. James’ erotic fan-fiction became Fifty Shades of Grey, a trilogy of books turned blockbuster film. Fifty has sold over 100 million copies and has earned $130 million in two weeks since the movie’s release. The studio is already working on film sequels to follow books 2 and 3. Twilight became a billion dollar empire and while James’ story, especially her writing, has been heavily criticized I’m of the mind everything was done quite intentionally as James was clever enough to see an open lane for massive profit. The formula: forbidden love story starring a naive, bland non-wealthy virgin girl who is found to be irresistible by a just-this-side-of-criminal, dangerous, intoxicatingly handsome and powerful older male love interest offering her tantalizing sex and a better life happily ever after. It allows women to be with the “bad boy” while taking no actual risks and still getting the Cinderella storybook ending.

Much has already been written about the book version of Fifty being a massive success largely due to the advent of e-readers, thus allowing female fans to discreetly enjoy their potentially-embarrassing “lady smut” anytime and anywhere. This plays to the imaginations of millions women and teen girls seeking permission to experience and enjoy their sexual desires with impunity, free of slut-shaming and the continual charade of performing sexuality as opposed to authentically feeling it and discovering just how deep it can go. The more popular the books became, the more women felt it was accepted for them to explore this genre. The books were written at a junior high reading level to draw in the teen audience post-Twilight who needed something new and sexy to fall into, as well as the non-reader who was assured by her friends the books “read quickly” and bought them just to see what the fuss was about. Fifty mainstreamed kink, albeit an inaccurate and abusive version of BDSM, which brought a sense of naughtiness and excitement. Soon family-friendly retailers were selling thousands of copies of “mommy porn”, which removed the barrier of access most women feel towards going into sex shops (that would also be off limits to youth under 18) where this type of erotic material would normally be found. Well played, E.L. James.

Fifty.2The character of Anastasia Steele (Ana) was written in a way that was so obnoxious you become numb to Christian treating her so poorly because you keep willing her to be hit by a taxi. Ana is a blank canvas of sorts, which allows the female reader to insert herself into the role and become lost as Christian’s sex slave. Christian is a psychologically stunted cad, making sure his needs are met while Ana serves as nothing more than a well-kept puppet. Their “romance” has ups and downs, twists and turns and ends dysfunctional ever after. Now, that is the BOOK version of Fifty……

Because the movie version of Fifty and the movie’s characters are completely different and change the way we interpret the story.

I saw the movie with a good friend who liked the books and reads a lot of what I teasingly call “panty burners”. We spent the morning texting each other jokes about shaving our legs for our date, both wearing grey sweaters with red shirts underneath, and that our husbands were put out they had not been invited. She and I have had many a discussion about this series, not always seeing eye to eye, but always being respectful of each other’s views. I went into the movie fully expecting to hate it. She bought me popcorn and made me promise not to complain through the whole two hours. The problem is, I didn’t despise the movie and it took me a full week to gather my thoughts. In fact, an hour in my friend turned to me and said, “Melissa, what in the world are you going to blog about??” She is very correct — I can see why people will defend it as a fantasy and a love story. I can see why it was released on Valentine’s Day – the movie version of Fifty was so transformed you could almost call it a romantic comedy. Almost.

With regard to the movie, forgetting about the books for a moment, I can see why people will refer to Christian as a prince. I can see why women are caught up in the physical sex appeal of the actors and the lavish lifestyle Christian’s wealth and affections bring. Hollywood does fantasy very well. I can see where it gets confusing because the movie becomes all the defenses people offer towards the problems in the books. In the movie the problems don’t exactly melt away, but they do become extremely blurred.

The sweeping camera angles, good lighting, and sexy actors don’t help to make anything more clear for the viewer, especially with Beyonce signing seductively in the background. The nice things I’m going to say about the movie don’t remove the myriad problems Fifty presents, they simply represent what most people, especially teens, are going to walk away with. Please understand one very clear, very concerning thing: the book versions of Fifty are nothing like the first movie for Fifty and this will confuse if not blow away all of the red flags and important discussion points on healthy sexuality, relationship violence, consent, and communication that people need to understand. Most specifically young people who don’t have the frame of reference most adults will in figuring all of this out.

My great concern is, young people will get little to no guidance making heads or tails of any of this.


Dakota Johnson does a phenomenal job giving life to Ana – a very likable one – and we see a smart, strong, funny, and quick-witted young woman awaken to her sexual self. She toys with Christian and his strong emotions for her as she plays at grown up sex and relationships for the first time. The movie seems to switch the roles, with Ana in charge and leading Christian on as he begs her with his pleading, billionaire eyes to agree to take him as her lover and sign the contract. The contract will allow for their Dominant/submissive relationship, which is framed in the movie as Ana having complete, informed consent on just exactly what is about to go down. In the twenty minutes of sex scenes in the movie we see Christian rocking Ana’s world with amazing orgasms that leave her literally weak in his arms. In the movie, Christian is attentive to Ana and she cannot get enough of him, shown breathless and wanting through much of the latter half of the film.

The rest of the sex scenes are racy but not raunchy, yet still explicit enough to earn nervous giggles from the rest of our theater audience made up of groups teen girls or twenty-somethings and their boyfriends. You know who was not in our theater at all? Older adult couples who are more likely seasoned in their sexual experiences and preferences, and have trusted partners they give of themselves to in the bedroom (and wherever else they choose to get it on). You know who I wouldn’t want to see this movie with? My idiot teen boyfriend educated about sex by online gonzo porn, who has no real clue what to do with my body to keep it safe and pleasured during different types of sex, let alone connect with me on an intimate emotional level that proper BDSM requires.

My friend pointed out Ana stays true to herself, firmly establishing and maintaining her boundaries, and capturing the heart of a seemingly desirable partner who ignores the elegant women surrounding him for her. She wears very little makeup and a wardrobe that is not overtly sexy nor sophisticated. I pointed out Ana, or rather Dakota Johnson, fits the body ideal of white woman beauty: gorgeous face, milky hairless skin, breasts and buttocks that are just big enough to be sexy but still small enough to look like a perky teenager, a tiny waist, slender limbs with no muscle definition and hip bones that jut out. She is delicate where Christian is athletic and muscular, Ana seeming almost child-like when she is being carried in his arms.

The movie makes clear Christian is the self-aware and sexually experienced one, but Ana is definitely the one in control of how things play out sexually. We see Ana display sexual agency, almost using Christian as a sex tour guide as she eagerly and willingly explores. Despite being a novice, Ana does not shy away from Christian’s sexual preferences and at times even seems to mock them as no big deal or even not out of the ordinary. Christian always asks for consent before each and every sex scene. In fact, there is consent up, down, right and left in the movie and it felt like it was put in by director Sam Taylor- Johnson to make a point. Perhaps it was one of the spots of vitriolic contention reported between Taylor-Johnson and James, with T-J turning this story into a female-driven sexy rom-com and E.L. in the background screaming in a rage, “NO! He is just supposed to TAKE her from behind and destroy her ****y so she is so sore she understands she belongs to him only! ARGH! WHERE are my whips and nipple clamps?!” Where James wanted Fifty to be an explicit S&M movie, Taylor-Johnson turned it into a tasteful love affair between a more empowered female protagonist and incredibly less despicable male protagonist who are figuring each other out and growing as individuals as they communicate their needs and wants. (I cannot believe I just wrote that sentence.)

This isn't going to look or feel like domestic and sexual abuse to most movie goers.

This isn’t going to look or feel like domestic and sexual abuse to most movie goers.

We see none of the viciousness we get from Christian in the book. Christian was completely unlikable psychopath in the book. In the movie he is alluring-bordering-on-charismatic, especially if you have no background on Book Christian. Jamie Dornan is sensual and smoldering, his body fitting every cultural requirement for male sex appeal. In the beginning of the film we see Movie Christian save Movie Ana from almost being hit by oncoming traffic (something I would have welcomed for Book Ana). A short time later he rescues a very drunk Movie Ana in distress after she is separated from her roommate during a night of partying. Movie Ana is trying to decline a kiss from her male friend while he insists, physically restraining her from getting away until Movie Christian appears, punches him out, and yells “I believe the lady said NO!” Thereby in some weird parallel universe appearing to send a strong message about consent and onlookers intervening when incapacitated women are being assaulted (a crime he commits frequently in the books). Through the whole film Movie Christian takes great care to gain consent at each sexual encounter, please his lover, and provide tender after care following consensual exploits in the red room (his “BDSM” playroom). Even the stalking in the book – showing up at the hardware store, the bar scene when Ana gets sick, taking drunk Ana to the hotel room, the surprise visit at her mom’s all appear to have reasonable explanations that come from a place of concern and his blooming love for her – not because he is an obsessed and maniacal creep trying to control a young woman’s life, like Book Christian. The movie moves quickly through  the elaborate gifts Christian bestows Ana, making him appear to be a doting boyfriend with expensive tastes. The movie also shifts the way we interpret the back-and-forth Book Christian does with “I can’t have you and you can’t have me. Here, have some expensive gifts. I need you to be mine forever, you should steer clear of me. Let’s go for a ride in my helicopter” game. In the book, his “inability to leave her alone” felt like a training manual at women’s crisis hotline. That isn’t meant to be flip – The relationship between Christian and Ana in the book is downright disturbing. In the movie that disturbance becomes fuzzy, especially if you have no premise from the book version, Ana and Christian are shown as sexy star-crossed lovers whose relationship is steamy, patient, equally balanced, and built on respect of where each is coming from. Taylor-Johnson seems to understand James’ story needing tweaking to appear hot and desirable on screen. The movie version feels much more like the kind of romance and sex women do really want, and let’s be honest T-J’s job is to create a film that gets ticket buyers in the door. Whether she intentionally corrected so many of the books wrongs remains a mystery.

It isn’t until the final ten minutes of the film we start to see this might be very problematic and dangerous for Ana. And when that scene happens my friend and I were not only emotionally disturbed by it, there was a noticeable shift in mood across the entire theater. We immediately commented on it to each other. Our audience had been chatty and laughing through the film but the final scenes had everyone leaving the theater in silence. Maybe that was the best thing to come out of the night — how clearly uncomfortable the audience was by Movie Christian’s abuse and violence once it was clearly exposed. Suddenly, he no longer looked like a sexy prince. You wanted Movie Ana out of there fast, and you sighed with relief when the elevator door closed. You cheer Ana’s strength for leaving Movie Christian and you wish he could be the man Movie Ana deserves.

And here’s how all of this becomes one giant, big mess — where the hundreds of millions of copies of creepy, abusive Book Christian and doormat, victimized Book Ana collide with the charming, sexy Movie Christian and interesting, eager Movie Ana to create a churning ball of mixed messages for a generation of young people who are absolutely going to be exposed to this and who absolutely are going to receive zero comprehensive sex education from school nor are likely to have meaningful and ongoing conversations with their parents about sexuality, consent, sex (and all the different types of), and emotional maturity in sexual relationships. As this excellent post establishes, the movie contorts what is really going on: an abuser who uses “BDSM” to disguise his intentions while his victim is taught to view the abuse as normal, and normalcy as special.

Fifty is a massive pop culture influence and it will normalize a number of unhealthy and unsafe ideas:

1. Consent is the absence of “no”, as opposed to what it should be: an informed and enthusiastic “yes!” Read more about that here and here.

2. If he loves you he might get angry or violent when you frustrate him because he loves you so much. If he loves you it isn’t rape. If it was sex you didn’t understand or regret it isn’t rape.  Read more about that here and here.

3. BDSM is a catch-all term for using toys as well as being rough and violent during sex. Abused children grow up to be into BDSM. Read more about that here and here.

My friend and women’s rights activist Regina Yau summarized everything perfectly when she said, “You know what’s really sad?
That the film adaptation of Fifty is based on a book written by a female author, and is directed by a female director working off a script written by a female scriptwriter. This should’ve been a moment we can celebrate – an anomalous bright spot in the male-dominated movie industry landscape. We should’ve had a top quality story about female empowerment and sexuality that we could all root for and that would show once and for all that women are a viable and profitable audience demographic that can drive more female-centric pop culture stories – that women’s stories and experiences matter on all levels. What do we get? A badly-written book and film that glorifies domestic/relationship violence and male abusers.”

The story we need to be telling is that as women have every right to enjoy erotic experiences, but we must love ourselves and each other more than to come anywhere close to accepting degradation and violence as our ultimate fantasy. Fifty Shades of Grey is not fantasy. It is the worst of us.

Need help understanding all of this for yourself and wondering how to talk to your teen or young adult about all of this? I suggest these resources:

1. Here is a list of fifty critical thinking questions and discussion points around the Fifty franchise from the sex-talk help org Educate Empower Kids. The list is useful to parents to help sort out your thoughts, and offers an excellent road map for what you should be talking to your teens about. Read it here. Another great post about why we need to talk to our kids and how this ties in with other children’s narratives is here.

2. If you need a better understanding of what BDSM is and how it is responsibly practiced, visit here.

3. A media literacy overview of Fifty and the problems it blurs for teens by Shaping Youth can be found here.

4. Understand what teen dating violence is, what it looks and feels like, and how prevalent it is. Read more here.


Melissa Atkins Wardy is a speaker, media consultant, and the author of Redefining Girly: How Parents Can Fight the Stereotyping and Sexualizing of Girlhood, from Birth to Tween. She is the creator and owner of Pigtail Pals & Ballcap Buddies, a company that has been offering empowering apparel and gifts to Full of Awesome kids since 2009 www.pigtailpals.com.

Find her at www.melissaatkinswardy.com. You can read her blog at: www.pigtailpalsblog.com or connect with her on Facebook (Pigtail Pals Ballcap Buddies) and Twitter (@PigtailPals).


On Miley, Race, and Listening

This is my final post about the Miley/Thicke VMA circus. This post is about race and listening. In honor of the fiftieth anniversary yesterday of Dr. King’s “I Have A Dream” speech, let’s take some time to listen to what is being said in this post I am about to share with you.

This is something you may need to bookmark for later because it is an important read, and if you are distracted by kids or work you will not be able to take it all in.

Since writing my post Tuesday titled “Miley, Robin, Race, Raunch and Kids” on how to talk about the VMA performance with your kids, I have been called racist for talking about the cultural appropriation and history of twerking and ratchet culture. Talking about race does not make one racist. Not everyone saw the racist component to Miley’s individual performance. I’m not going to retort to be called a racist, except to say that the reason that focus was in my piece is everything this post is about.

Playing the desirability of black female bodies as a “wink-wink” joke is a way of lifting up our deviant sexuality without lifting up black women as equally desirable to white women. Cyrus did not just have black women gyrating behind her. She had particularly rotund black women. She gleefully slaps the ass of one dancer like she intends to eat it on a cracker. She is playing a type of black female body as a joke to challenge her audience’s perceptions of herself  while leaving their perceptions of black women’s bodies firmly intact.  It’s a dance between performing sexual freedom and maintaining a hierarchy of female bodies from which white women benefit materially.  -Tressie McMillan Cottom

Please continue to read Tressie’s post in its entirety here:


There is a movement on twitter right now called #solidarityisforwhitewomen, essentially asking white feminists to listen to what their browned skinned sisters are saying and feeling. The work we do here has a lot of intersectionality with feminism and race, and because we are a thoughtful community committed to breaking down stereotypes I ask that you give this post some time to settle in.

It is okay if you don’t know what to say, if some of it leaves you speechless or angers you. It should anger you, actually, but you might not have the words to express that anger. And the point is, you don’t need to have the words, because this time, it is okay to be silent.

This time, it is okay to respond with “I’m listening and learning.”

Did You Just Call My Daughter A Prostitute?

Whore-friendly panties. If ever three words made my head explode, they were it, considering they were said about panties belonging to ten year old girls. Ten year old girls, 4th graders, cannot be whores.

Please repeat after me: A prostitute is a woman who trades sex for money. Whores, sluts, skanks, and tramps are judgements, not people. It is important to recognize that our sexily dressed little girls are not whores, they most likely have no sexual history at all. They are little girls being allowed to wear sexualized clothing by the parents who should be looking out for them.

Wal-Mart's 2007 #pantyfail

I think what LZ Granderson meant was the innuendo of sex for money/gifts that a pair of panties that reads “Who needs credit cards?” gives, suggesting the use of the anatomy the panties cover would garner the wearer the same end result as would the purchasing power of a credit card. The problem, of course, is the way Mr. Granderson worded it, the statement came off sounded like the slut-shaming of a girl too young to understand the message her panties send; a girl certainly not deserving of stigmatized and controlling views of her sexuality. Mr. Granderson has no right to call any female a whore.

Clothing, or lack of clothing, does not make someone a prostitute. When we are cavalier about the degrading terms we use for our girls, we belittle their inherent worth, and desensitize ourselves to what it really means to be a prostitute. From what I hear, it isn’t a great lifestyle. The proximity I had with it as an investigator revealed it to be brutal, lonely, and dangerous. Our culture sends mixed messages to young women to be hot and sexy and available at all times, and then as soon as these women or girls become sexual agents and act on their desires they face the repressive push-back from society and are branded sluts and whores. Confused? So am I.

When we see a girl dressed in an outfit sexy beyond her years, as a concerned parent like Mr. Granderson, we raise our eye brows, catch our breath, worry about what messages she is growing up with. As cited in the original CNN post, the 2007 watershed studyby the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls revealed that early sexualization harbors danger for our growing daughters: low self-esteem, eating disorders, substance abuse, poor body image, early promiscuity.

Do I think “Juicy” in glittery silk-screened paint across the bum of a child is inappropriate? Yes I do. Let’ s just put our cards on the table, although the Juicy brand actually has an interesting history of two entrepreneurial women behind it…..when someone is bent over and their ass says “Juicy”, that means exactly what you think it means, especially to heterosexual men ages 16-92 years old.

I loved and hated Mr. Granderson’s CNN piece. Loved it because yes, parents are not meant to be their child’s friend and we need to step up and say “NO” to a lot of what is being marketed to our kids. The money to buy this garbage is coming from somewhere, as Granderson says, “I guess I’ve been out-of-the-loop and didn’t realize there’s been an ongoing stampede of 10-year-old girls driving to the mall with their tiny fists full of cash demanding sexier apparel. What’s that you say? Ten-year-olds can’t drive? They don’t have money, either?”

Mr. Granderson misses two things, maybe because he doesn’t have a daughter – first, tween/teen girls usually shop in packs sans parents are become their own consumer-at-large in a marketplace ripe with sexualization at every turn. I made boodles of money as a teen from babysitting, and bought my own clothes with my friends. Second – everything is a battle for parents these days. Yes, LL Bean has nice, appropriate choices, but I did not shop at LL Bean when I was 14, did you? It is unfair to put the onus entirely on parents because the marketing of this crap is relentless. Relentless.

I hated Granderson’s piece because no man, certainly not a father, has the right to call someone else’s child a slut, whore, skank, bitch, cunt, stripper, prostitute, tramp or hooker. It hurts all women to speak that way, but to use those terms towards a young girl is particularly distasteful, and I will not stand for it. Nor will I stand for girls and women to be ashamed of their sexuality or sexual history.

The prefered term, should you know someone whose daughter actually is a prostitute or dancer (stripper), is sex worker. They work in the sex trade industry. 

Mr. Granderson, not raising a daughter, was perhaps not aware of his transgression as there are no words to the equivalent for his son, that morning the boy tried to wear his pants hanging off his bum.

I absolutely think parents need to turn this ship around, send strong messages to marketers and corporations, and teach our daughters how to dress themselves with respect. But we need to do this with grace towards other families. Not all parents are aware of this issue yet, or some are but have no idea what to do about it.

I adore this comment from Emily, a mama from the Pigtail Pals facebook page:

The bitter irony in using sexual terms to describe a girl who is wearing sexualized clothing is that the observer, in making that judgment, becomes a complicit participant in the sexualization. If we want to stop the sexualization of our children, we can stop by filtering them through a lens of adult-directed judgement. Just because they are wearing clothing we are used to seeing (and likely judging) on adults, doesn’t make them little adults anymore than putting a tutu on my cat makes her a ballerina.

How each family determines what is appropriate dress or not is going to depend on the family and the age of the girl. Generally speaking, there are some garments in cultural perspective that carry fetishized meanings with them – knee high boots, fishnets, mini skits, lace thigh highs, candy red high heels….I would say those are no-no’s for the under 18 set. And yes, I agree shorty short shorts and low cut tops are advertising body parts of young girls. You’ll have to decide where you draw your line. And yes, much of the girls departments offer clothing that turns girls into mini-adults and I’m not a fan of that trend. But no piece of clothing turns a girl into a tramp.

So what do we take away from the this week’s hullabaloo about kids, sex, gender, and childhood?

One – we can open a larger conversation about slut-shaming and stop assuming  and judging a person’s sexual history and sexual availability based on their outfit.

Two – we can see that there is no black/white to this issue. It isn’t just parents at fault, it isn’t just companies/marketers at fault. We need, as a culture, a fundamental shift in how we view our children, and how we value childhood. When our culture’s preoccupation with sex creeps down into middle school, grade school, and holy hell – preschool – we’ve got MUCH bigger problems than trashy panties with sexual innuendo and push-up bras for breasts that haven’t developed yet. Those are just symptoms of the problem.

If any media outlets are ready to talk about the real issues, I offer myself as a delightful guest. As long as we continue to focus on the symptoms, we only give lip service to the “too sexy, too soon” generation.

*Photo from Scared Monkeys blog, with post linked above, and again here.